检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马涛[1]
机构地区:[1]复旦大学,上海200433
出 处:《云南大学学报(社会科学版)》2007年第4期73-80,共8页The Journal of Yunnan University:Social Sciences Edition
摘 要:本文回顾了从马克思对市场经济自由主义理论的批判以及从奥地利学派到哈耶克市场经济自由主义理论思潮再次崛起的历史过程。以往的讨论总是在有缺陷的市场和不完美的政府之间进行选择。本文则以为,从经济分析上说只有当政府干预失灵的净损失小于市场失灵的净损失时,政府的干预才应该是合理的;政府和市场的关系应当是相互补充、各自均应吸取对方的优点来改进自身的缺点以提高自身的效率;而如何找到二者结合的最佳均衡以提高经济运行的效率,这才是现代经济学要重点解决的问题。就此而言,布坎南的宪政思想主张对我们无疑具有一定的启发性。This paper gives a historical account of Marx's criticism of liberalism of market economy and the historical process from the Austrian School to Hayek's liberalism of market economy. The past criticism always focused on either the defective market or the imperfect government. The paper holds that the government intervention is reasonable only when the net loss caused by the failure of the government intervention is less than that caused by the market failure. The government and the market should be mutually supplementary by absorbing each other's merits and improving efficiency. In order to improve the efficiency of economic operation, modern economics should focus on the study of the optimum balance between the two, and Buchanan's constitutional and political ideas can shed light on our understanding of the relationship between state and market.
分 类 号:F091.91[经济管理—政治经济学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.221.244.218