检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:袁金忠[1] 熊理[1] 龙春娇[1] 孙远超[1]
机构地区:[1]中南大学湘雅三医院湘雅移植医学研究院血液净化中心,长沙410013
出 处:《中国中西医结合肾病杂志》2007年第8期469-471,共3页Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Nephrology
基 金:湖南省科技厅基金资助项目(No.03SSY4031)
摘 要:目的:评定无肝素血液透析(heparin free hemodialysis,hfHD)对实际尿素清除率的影响。方法:收集500例次用肝素、500例次无肝素的血液透析资料,计算Kt/V和透析效率,对比两者的差异。结果:标准肝素透析(hemodialysis,HD)和hfHD的理论上的Kt/V值之比、实际的Kt/V值之比及透析效率之比分别为:(1.73±0.28)/(1.64±0.34),P>0.05;(1.41±0.30)/(1.34±0.36),P>0.05;(0.80±0.13)/(0.78±0.18),P>0.05。结论:血流速率提高后的hfHD技术并不显著降低溶质的实际清除率,不需要延长单次血透治疗的时间。Objective: To define the clinically relevant consequences of heparin-free hemodialysis (hfHD). Methods: Two groups of hemodialysis treatments were performed, one group with 500 patients was performed with heparin, and the another group with 500 patients was performed as hfHD. Prescribed and delivered Kt/V and dialysis efficiency were calculated respectively. Results: The prescribed Kt/V was 1.73 ± 0.28 for standard hemodialysis with heparin vs. 1.64 ± 0.34 for hfHD (P 〉 0.05). The delivered Kt/V was 1.41 ±0.30 vs. 1.34±0.36 (P〉0.05). Efficiency was 0.80 ±0.13 vs. 0.78±0.18 (P〉0.05) .Conclusion: The properly modified hfHD technique does not compromise delivery of dialysis. Increased treatment time is not necessary.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222