检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李传富[1,2] 朱震[1,2] 王兴族[1,2] 马革 李天东 张新利[1,2] 孟海燕 王宁新[1,2] 王金萍 宋执云[1,2]
机构地区:[1]安徽中医学院附属医院超声诊断科 [2]青岛大学医学院附属心血管病医院
出 处:《中华超声影像学杂志》1997年第3期145-148,共4页Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography
摘 要:采用常规彩色多普勒技术(常规法)和彩色多普勒血流会聚法(会聚法)对52例生理性二尖瓣返流和87例病理性二尖瓣返流患者进行了对比研究。结果发现:33/52(63%)例生理性二尖瓣返流和87/87(100%)例病理性二尖瓣返流可于二尖瓣左室面显示血流会聚区;与常规法定量测值(返流束长度和面积)相比,会聚法定量测值(返流率和每搏返流量)在生理性与病理性二尖瓣返流之间的重叠程度较小。表明会聚法在生理性二尖瓣返流的诊断及鉴别诊断中优于常规法。In this study, 52 cases of physiological MR and 87 cases of pathological MR were studied with Flow Convergence Method (FCR)and conventional color flow imaging (CFI). Flow convergence region, which was located in the left ventricular sides of mitral valve, was displayed in 63%(33/52)of physiological MR and 100%(87/87) of pathological MR. The values of mitral regurgitant stroke volume and regurgitant flow rate calculated with FCR was less overlapped between physiological and pathological MR than those of regurgitant jet length and area obtained with CFI. It was demonstrated that FCR method was superior to conventional CFI in the quantification of physiological MR.
分 类 号:R542.510.4[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117