检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张兆锋[1] 沈华[1] 钱鋆[1] 黄燮青[1] 黄一雄[1] 贾万新[1] 沈尊理[1]
机构地区:[1]上海交通大学附属第一人民医院整形科,上海200080
出 处:《中国美容医学》2007年第8期1058-1060,共3页Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine
摘 要:目的:对肿胀抽吸术及腋皱襞小切口皮下修剪术治疗腋臭两种方法进行临床评估。方法:采用这两种方法治疗腋臭患者116例,平均随访32月。从有效率、并发症发生率及出汗改善情况等方面进行临床评估。结果:肿胀抽吸术并发症的发生率低,但复发率高;腋皱襞小切口皮下修剪法有效率高,但并发症的发生率高。两种方法均可一定程度改善出汗状况。结论:对腋臭的治疗,两种方法各有优缺点,经医患双方沟通后,应根据情况采用个性化的治疗方案,方可获得良好的治疗效果。Objective To evaluate the therapy results on axillary osmidrosis by superficial lipsuction and manual shaving via small insions. Methods From Jan 2000 to Jun 2005, 116 patients (only 77 were available for long-term follow up) underwent surgery for bilateral axillary osmidrosis with two methods. The surgical complication and results were compared. Results Lipsuction comes out significantly fewer complications but is more recurrence than manual shaving for the treatment of axillary osmidrosis. The sweating can be reduced by two procedures without significant differences. Conclusion For the different cases, appropriate procedure is chosed deliberatively.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7