华南地区覆盖旱种水稻节水及其水分利用效率研究  

Study on Water-saving and Water Use Efficiency of Aerobic Rice with Mulching in South China

作　　者：汪强[1] 樊小林[2] D.Klaus B.Sattemacher 

机构地区：[1]河南农业大学资源与环境学院,郑州450002 [2]华南农业大学资源与环境学院,广州510642 [3]Institute of Plant Nutrition and SoilScience,Charistan Albrecht University,Kiel,Germany

出　　处：《灌溉排水学报》2007年第4期89-92,共4页Journal of Irrigation and Drainage

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目(39970420)

摘　　要：大田试验条件下设置常规水稻(T11)、覆膜旱作水稻(T12)、覆草旱作水稻(T13)和裸地旱作水稻(T14)4个处理,研究旱作水稻的节水效率及水分利用效率。水稻本田期T11用水总量545.40 mm,显著高于各旱作处理水稻,以此为参照,T12、T13和T14节水效率分别为35.1%、22.8%和21.2%。以裸地旱作处理T14为参照,T12节水率17.7%,而T13无明显节水效果。旱作水稻的节水效果主要发生在水稻移栽后前2个月,之后无明显节水效果。各处理以籽粒产量/耗水量为基础计算的水分利用效率(WUE),T12、T13、T14和T11处理分别为1.47、1.31、1.21和1.05 g/kg,以干物质量/耗水量为基础计算的WUE各处理之间的趋势与以籽粒产量/耗水量计算的WUE基本一致。Field experiments with four treatments that were normal paddy rice （T12）, aerobic rice with plastic film mulching （T12）, aerobic rice with straw mulching （T13） and aerobic rice without mulching （T14） were set up to explore the water-saving and water use efficiency of aerobic rice in South China. The amount of water consumed by Tll was 545.40 mm, which was significantly higher than that of aerobic rice treatments. Comparing with Tll the water saving efficiency （WSE） of T12, T13 and T14 was 35. 1%, 22.8% and 21.2% respectively. Comparing with T14 the WSE of T12 was 17.7%, and water consumption of T13 was almost the same as T14. The effective water saving period of aerobic cultivations was the first two months after transplanting and then there was no significant water saving effect. The water use efficiency （WUE） calculated with grain yield divided by total water consumption of aerobic cultivations were significantly higher than that of normal paddy rice. The WUE of T12, T13, T14 and Tll was 1.47, 1.31, 1.21 and 1.05 g/kg respectively. The trend of WUE of each treatment calculated with biomass divided by total water consumption was same as WUE calculated with grain yield divided by total water consumption.

关 键 词：水稻 覆盖旱作 节水效率 水分利用效率 

分 类 号：S511[农业科学—作物学]