检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:沈建琴[1] 徐文亚[1] 庄细琴[1] 刘青[1] 陈建芬[1] 朱滨[1]
出 处:《中华当代医学》2007年第4期10-11,共2页Chinese Modern Medicine
摘 要:目的研究更适合机械通气患者气管内吸痰的方式。方法选取外科重症监护病房(SICU)和急诊重症监护病房(EICU)机械通气治疗的61例患者为研究对象,随机选择使用密闭式气管内吸痰(CS)和开放式气管内吸痰(OS)两种吸痰方式,于吸痰前后记录脉搏血氧饱和度(SpO2)的变化并比较两组患者并发症例数。结果吸痰中、吸痰后0.5minOS治疗组各时点SpO2值较吸痰前1min下降明显(P〈0.05),CS治疗组吸痰前后SpO2值无显著差异(P〉0.05)。两组并发症比较无显著差异(P〉0.05)。结论CS对机械通气患者更有利。Objective To find a better way of endotracbeal suction and care in patients on mechanical ventilation. Methotis Sixty - one patients who were on mechanical ventilation in SICU or EICU were divided at random into the CS ( closed endotracbeal, suctioning) group (therapeutic group, 30 patients) and the OS (open endotracbeal suctioning) group (contrast group, 31 patients). The data of oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry( SpO2 ) were obtained before and after suction. The cases of complication incidence were compared between two groups. Results There was a significant decrease in SpO2 after OS ( P 〈 0.05 ). The differences were not statistically significant before and after CS. There was no differences in complication incidence between two groups (P 〈 0.05) . Conclusion CS has a good therapeutic effect for patients on mechanical ventilation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.17.175