检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姚钢炼[1] 廖婷婷[1] 桂保松[1] 马力群[1] 张星映[1] 周琳[1]
机构地区:[1]西安交通大学医学院第二附属医院肾病科,陕西西安710004
出 处:《中国新药与临床杂志》2007年第9期653-656,共4页Chinese Journal of New Drugs and Clinical Remedies
摘 要:目的:评价国产巴洛沙星治疗急性泌尿系统感染的有效性及安全性。方法:采用多中心、随机、双盲、阳性药物平行对照研究方法。214例急性泌尿系统感染病人随机分为2组。试验组(n=105)男性22例,女性83例,年龄(40±s 14)a;对照组(n=109)男性20例,女性89例,年龄(39±12)a。试验组予巴洛沙星100 mg,对照组予左氧氟沙星100 mg,均口服,bid,疗程5~14 d。观察2组治疗前后症状、体征、尿常规、尿细菌培养等的变化。结果:试验组和对照组总治愈率、有效率分别为77.1%、96.2%和81.8%、97.3%,2组差异无显著意义(P>0.05)。2组细菌清除率为95%和94%,无显著差异(P>0.05)。2组不良反应发生率为8.2%和8.9%(P>0.05),主要表现为恶心、腹泻和转氨酶暂时性升高。结论:国产巴洛沙星可有效治疗急性泌尿系统感染。AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of domestic balofloxacin tablets in the treatment of acute bacterial urinary tract infections. METHODS: A randomized and comparative control clinical study recruited from 214 patients with urinary tract infections dividing into 2 groups randomly; 105 patients (M 22, F 83, age (40 ± s 14) a) with balofloxacin 100 mg bid orally in the trial group and 109 patients (M 20, F 89, age (39 ± 12) a) with levofloxacin 100 mg bid orally in the control group, were under a course of 5 to 14 days. Symptoms, signs, urinary routine test and urinary germiculture were undertaken and compared before and after treatment for both groups. RESULTS: The totle cure rates and effective rates of trial and control group were 77.1% vs 96.2 % and 81.8 % vs 97.3 %; the bacterial eradication rates were 95 % vs 94 %, respectively; for the trial and control group showing no significant difference (P 〉 0.05) . The incidence of adverse reactions was 8.2 % vs 8.9 % (P 〉 0.05) for both groups, including nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and transient elevated transaminases. CONCLUSION: Domestic balofloxacin is effective for the treatment of acute urinary tract infections.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15