检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘江会[1]
出 处:《财经研究》2007年第9期124-134,143,共12页Journal of Finance and Economics
基 金:上海市哲学社会科学基金项目(2005BJL008)
摘 要:文章认为由于"机会主义"和"善意错误"的存在,致使投资银行在价值认证中面临"可信性"问题。文章利用C-F模型,探讨了投资银行声誉对解决"可信性"问题的意义,并通过分析投资银行声誉与发行企业质量、IPO抑价和承销费用之间的关系,发现投资银行声誉机制具有"信号显示"、"价值发现"和"补偿激励"等重要功能。由于没有很好地解决可信性问题,投资银行声誉机制的这些功能在我国基本不存在,因此我国投资银行很难发挥价值认证作用,这是我国证券发行市场有效性不足的一个重要原因。As an important value certification agency, investment bank always meets creditability problem due to its opportunism and honest mistakes. Employing the C-F model, this paper investigates the effects of reputation on investment bank's creditability. By analyzing the relationships between investment bank's reputation and quality of issuing firm, IPO underprice and underwriting fee, it finds that investment bank's reputation mechanism has some important functions, such as signaling, value discovering and compensation incentive. However, in China these functions never exist owing to not resolving creditability problem. China's investment bank can't play the role of value certification, which may be a key reason for the inefficiency of China's security issuing market.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.217.200.151