机构地区:[1]浙江金华市中心医院,浙江金华321000 [2]金华职业技术学院,浙江金华321007 [3]浙江金华广福医院,浙江金华321000
出 处:《金华职业技术学院学报》2007年第4期51-59,共9页Journal of Jinhua Polytechnic
基 金:2004年度金华市科技局计划资助项目(2004-1-360)
摘 要:目的:研究三类抗生素治疗(氟喹诺酮类药物—拜复乐,大环内酯族—阿奇霉素,β内酰胺类—优立新),对控制COPD急性发作(AECOPD),缩短治疗周期,对病人肺功能及生存质量的影响。方法:采用随机病例对照研究。将符合入选标准的病例随机分为:治疗组为A组(拜复乐治疗组),用拜复乐400mg每日一次顿服×5天为一疗程,B组(阿奇霉素对照组)用阿奇霉素250mg qd首剂加倍×5天、C组(优立新对照组),用优立新375mg bid×10天为一疗程,每个病例随访1年。结果:在156例患者的痰标本中,分离出病原菌106株,总阳性率67.94%,其中革兰氏阳性菌占32.08%(34/106),主要为肺炎链球菌16.04%,革兰氏阴性菌占67.92%(72/106),主要由大肠埃希菌16.04%,阴沟肠杆菌16.98%等构成。三组细菌清除率和单次治疗临床疗效比较无显著差异(P>0.05)。在一年随访期间,A组病人发作次数(人次/年)158.5±24.7显著低于B组374.5±46.8和C组368.4±38.4(P<0.01),治疗后二次间急性发作间歇A组98.5±54.4天明显长于B组38.2±12.3天和C组43.8±17.2天(P=0.001)。在A组中一年随访后SGRQ量表评分显著降低,与治疗前相比有显著差异(P<0.01)。在B和C组中治疗前后评分无显著差异。生存质量评分在治疗前无显著差异的三组病人,在一年随访后,A组病人评分显著低于B和C组(P均<0.01)。随访一年后,A组肺功能指标(FVC、FEV1、PFVC、MMF、MVV)均高于治疗前(P<0.01),而B、C组治疗前后无显著差异(P>0.05)。随访一年后,A组肺功能指标显著高于B、C组(P均<0.01)。直线回归分析表明SGRQ的症状与FEV1有直线相关(P=0.002)。结论:拜复乐对控制下呼吸道感染较为有效,能改善和延缓肺功能下降速度;改善病情的严重度,表现为急性发作次数减少和治疗后缓解期的延长,为病人肺功能恢复和改善QOL提供前提。Objective:To study three antibiotics(Fluoroquinolone antibiotic-Moxifoxacin Tablets,Macrolide antibiotics-Azithromycin Dispersible Tablets,and β-lactams antibiotics-unasyn)on controlling AECOPD effect,shortening treatment periods,and affecting on lung function and quality of life(QOL).Methodes:Random case-control study,Patients were included in the study if they met standard criteria for the diagnosis of COPD,and to select the stable and exacerbations.Treatment:Patients were classified as three groups(A:Moxifoxacin treatment group,400mg qd×5 and B: Azithromycin matched group,250mg qd×5 and C: unasyn matched group,375mg bid×10),followed for 1 year.Result: Totally 156 phlegm samples were tested and 106 of them had bacteria,the positive rate was 67.94%.From them,the positive rate in Gram-positive cocci was 32.08%(34/106).Streptococcus pneumonia was 16.04% and in Gram-negative bacteria were 67.92%(72/106).Escherichia coli was 16.04%,Enterbacter Cloacae was 16.98%.The bacterial eradication rates and simple treatment Clinical Efficacy Results were no statistically significant difference between the three groups(P〉0.05.In one year follow-up period,fit numbers(patients-1yr-1)were lower in A group than matched group.(158.5±24.7 and B group374.5±46.8,C group 368.4±38.4,P〈0.01),Time to next exacerbation was longer,98.5±54.4(day) in A groug and 38.2±12.3(day) in B group,43.8±17.2(day) in c group,respectively(P=0.001).QOL(the disease-specific St.George's Respiratory questionnaire(SGRQ)) were lower than treatment before in A group(P〈0.01).But there were no a significant difference in B and C group(P〉0.05).After one-year treatment,there was a significant difference in A group and matched(B,C)group(P〈0.01).After one year,lung function was higher than treatment before in A group(P〈0.01),there were no a significant difference in matched(B,C)group(P〉0.05).lung function in A group were significantly higher than�
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...