检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]水电水利规划设计总院,北京100011 [2]河海大学水电学院,江苏南京210098
出 处:《水利水电技术》2007年第9期25-27,共3页Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering
摘 要:瑞典圆弧法与毕肖普简化法是当前采用在土石坝稳定分析的两种流行和常用方法,且国外多采用后者,究竟两种方法有什么样的差别,很少见到理论上的论述。笔者经研究认为,两种计算方法的成果,有时会有很大的差异,需要引起设计者的注意。Both Sweden Arc Method and Bishop's Simplified Method are two current and common methods apphed to the stability analysis on earth-rockfill dam, and the later is frequently used abroad. However, less theoretical discourses on the difference between these two methods are published yet. The study made herein by the author shows that the differece between the results from both calculating methods is larger occasionally, and then attention must be paid to the differece by the project designer concerned.
分 类 号:TV641[水利工程—水利水电工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3