检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘志云[1]
机构地区:[1]厦门大学国际经济法研究所,福建厦门361005
出 处:《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》2007年第5期86-98,共13页Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基 金:"福建省高等学校新世纪优秀人才支持计划"资助成果;国家社科基金项目"国际关系理论与当代国际法的实践"阶段性成果之一(项目编号:07CFX044)
摘 要:晚近,随着经济全球化的迅猛发展,国际经济领域掀起一股席卷各个层次的、以自由化为中心的造法运动,并初步构建出一个全球自由市场秩序体系。然而,当前国际经济立法面临着公平价值缺失的困境,并由此引发自身的"合法性"危机。鉴于此,在当代自由主义理论内部对正义内涵的争论中,寻找一种可资国际经济法的公平价值重构的理念成为必要,罗尔斯的复数正义理论对此提供了某种启发。当然,在国际经济法的公平价值重构中,发展中国家及我国对自身的正确定位以及战略选择也是至关重要的。With the fast growth of economic globalization,in the field of international economy,the liberalization-oriented law-making has emerged,which resulted in a preliminary rules mechanism in the global free market.But it is lost for the value of fairness of international economic law.Dwelling on this subject,the author first explores the causes of the dilemma referred above and then reviews the historical development of the theory of justice and compares the controversies over the connotation of justice within contemporary theory of liberalism.Furthermore,the author deeply explores the applicability of the theory of Justice of Rawls,and the role and its construction of international economic law as well.Finally,a couple of suggestions are provided for developing countries about the role of the equity in the liberalization of international economic law and their strategic selections.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249