情绪调节量表的信度和效度研究  

Reliability and validity of the emotion regulation scale

作　　者：王力[1] 柳恒超[2] 李中权[2] 杜卫[2] 

机构地区：[1]华南师范大学心理应用研究中心,广州510631 [2]北京师范大学心理学院

出　　处：《中国行为医学科学》2007年第9期846-848,共3页Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medical Science

摘　　要：目的考察情绪调节量表的信度和效度。方法采用新近编制的情绪调节量表对5个样本共1163名大学生被试进行了测试。结果情绪调节量表具有良好的信度指标,重新评价和表达抑制维度的重测信度系数分别是0.85和0.87;5个样本和总样本两个维度的α系数和G系数均达到了0.76以上。验证性因素分析的结果显示两因子相关为自由估计的标准测量模型与实际数据的拟合程度良好（2为364.21,2/DF为4.79,NFI为0.96,NNFI为0.96,IFI为0.97,CFI为0.97,RMSEA为0.057）,两因子相关为0的独立模型与标准测量模型之间无显著差异。效标效度的研究显示5个样本和总样本两个维度的效标指数均达到了0.70以上。实证效度的研究发现男性被试在表达抑制维度上的得分要显著高于女性被试。结论情绪调节量表具有良好的心理测量学品质,值得进一步推广和应用。Objective To examine reliability and validity of the emotion regulation scale. Methods Emotion regulation scale was administrated to total 1163 college students of five subsamples. Results The retest reliability coefficients of reappraisal and suppression subscale were 0.85 and 0.87 respectively. The α coefficients and G coefficients of two dimensions were all higher than 0. 76. The results of CFA showed that standard measurement model fit datum well （ %2 = 364.21, %2/DF = 4.79, NFI = 0. 96, NNFI = 0. 96, IFI = 0. 97, CFI = 0. 97, RMSEA =0.057）, and there was no significant difference between standard measurement model and independent model. The criterion-related validity indices of two dimensions were all higher than 0. 70. The results of empirical validity study showed that the scores of male on suppression dimension were significant higher than female. Conclusion Emotion regulation scale was found to have good psychometrics properties, which was worthy to be popularized and applied. Clinic psychology; Emotion regulation; Psychometrics ; Scale

关 键 词：临床心理学 情绪调节 心理测量学 量表 

分 类 号：R686[医药卫生—骨科学]