对我国刑法第133条的理性思考  

Rational Thoughts on Article 133 of the Criminal Law of PRC

作　　者：林文清[1] 

机构地区：[1]福建公安高等专科学校法律系,福建福州350007

出　　处：《三明学院学报》2007年第1期87-91,共5页Journal of Sanming University

摘　　要：我国刑法第133条交通肇事罪的规定在罪状的叙述上过于简单,最高人民法院就交通肇事罪的认定和处理的司法解释存在缺陷,使得在司法实务中难予准确的认定罪与非罪。从交通肇事犯罪立法现状出发,对我国现有立法框架内的交通肇事罪进行思考,在借鉴国外其他国家和地区立法经验的基础上,将交通肇事逃逸从交通肇事罪中分离,单独设立交通肇事不救助罪,通过对现行刑法第133条的重构达到对交通肇事犯罪立法的完善。The criminal description in regulations on traffic offences as prescribed in Article 133 of the Criminal Law seems to be overly simple, deficiencies in judicial interpretation of determination and treatment of traffic offences by the Supreme People＇s Court make it difficult in judicial affairs to correctly determine whether or not a crime has occurred. From the current situation of criminal legislation of traffic offences, with reflections on traffic offences within China＇s current legal framework and on the basis of drawing on legislative experiences of foreigu countries and areas, the paper tries to separate a hit-and-run crime from a traffic offence and regulate a single crime of non-rescuing after a traffic offence to achieve perfection of legislation of traffic offences by reconstruction of Article 133 of the current Criminal Law.

关 键 词：交通肇事罪 立法缺陷 构建 完善 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]