野生与人工栽培麻黄不同部位成分的比较研究  被引量:10

Comparison on constituents from different parts between wild growing and cultivated planting of Ephedra sinica

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:吴海[1] 易伦朝[1] 高敬铭[1] 刘向前[1] 梁逸曾[1] 

机构地区:[1]中南大学化学化工学院,湖南长沙410083

出  处:《中草药》2007年第9期1298-1301,共4页Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs

摘  要:目的比较野生与人工栽培的麻黄不同部位成分的差别。方法以50%甲醇为溶剂,用加热回流法分别提取野生与人工栽培麻黄的茎与根部,再以HPLC测定各个提取液中的麻黄碱的量。采用水蒸气蒸馏法提取麻黄挥发油,用GC-MS测定野生与栽培的麻黄挥发油中的成分。结果HPLC测定野生麻黄的茎与根的提取液中分别含麻黄碱0.55%和0.00057%,人工栽培麻黄的茎与根的提取液中分别含麻黄碱0.26%和0.0017%。用GC-MS确定了麻黄挥发油中的45种物质,其中野生和栽培品共有成分13种。结论野生麻黄茎中含麻黄碱的量约是人工栽培的2倍,而在两种麻黄的根中麻黄碱的量都非常低。在麻黄挥发油中未发现麻黄碱。Objective To compare the difference in constituents from different parts of wild and cultivated Ephedra sinica. Methods Using the solvent of 50% methyl alcohol to extract from the stems and roots of wild and cultivated E. sinica under heating reflux, respectively and then determine the content of ephedrine in each extractions by HPLC. The volatile oil was extracted by stream-distillation and analyzed by GC-MS method. Results The content of the ephedrine in extraction of stems and roots of wild E. sini- ca was 0.55% and 0. 000 57% while the content of the cultivated was 0.26% and 0. 001 7%. Forty-five compounds in the volatile oil were identified by GC-MS method, among them 13 compounds existed in both wild and cultivated E. sinica. Conclusion The content of the ephedrine is about two times of the cultivated in wild E. sinicars stems, while it is very low in the roots of two kinds of herbs. And ephedrine is not found in the volatile oil.

关 键 词:麻黄 野生/栽培 HPLC GC—MS 

分 类 号:R284.1[医药卫生—中药学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象