检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张耀辉[1] 郭金茂[1] 张仕新[1] 李爱民[1]
机构地区:[1]装甲兵工程学院,北京100072
出 处:《火炮发射与控制学报》2007年第3期8-12,共5页Journal of Gun Launch & Control
摘 要:维修方式的选择是制定装备维修方案的一个重要问题。将维修方式分为修复性维修、探测维修、定时维修、状态维修、预先维修和改进性维修。讨论了各种维修方式的适用性和有效性,分析了维修方式的选择顺序,建立了一个新的维修方式逻辑决策模型。该模型分为3个部分:非重要功能产品和故障风险可以接受的重要功能产品的维修决策;故障风险不能接受的重要功能产品的预防性维修决策;重要功能产品的改进性维修决策。与常用的MSG3和RCM2逻辑决策模型的对比分析表明,该逻辑决策方法简单、明了,便于操作。The choice of maintenance modes is a very important problem for laying down maintenance concept of military equipment. Maintenance modes can be divided into corrective maintenance, detective maintenance, time-based maintenance, condition-based maintenance, proactive maintenance and improve- ment maintenance. Applicability and validityof maintenance modes were discussed, and selection order of maintenance modes was analyzed. A new logic decision model of maintenance modes was put forward. The model was composed of three parts: the maintenance decision of non-functionally significant item (NFSI) and functionally significant item (FSI) which failure risk is acceptable, the preventive maintenance decision of FSI which failure risk is not acceptable, and the improvement maintenance decision of FSI. Compared with the logic decision models of MSG3 and RCM2, the logic decision method of maintenance modes is clear, simple and easy to use.
分 类 号:TH173[机械工程—机械制造及自动化]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.217