傅斯年“史学只是史料学”再析  

Re-analysis of Fu Sinian's View that "The Study of History Is Only the Study of Historical Materials"

作　　者：桑兵[1] 

机构地区：[1]中山大学历史系,教授广州510275

出　　处：《近代史研究》2007年第5期26-41,共16页Modern Chinese History Studies

摘　　要：傅斯年提出"近代史学只是史料学",始于《历史语言研究所工作之旨趣》,完整的表述,却是《史学方法导论》。该讲义可能并未完稿,但其中重要的几讲已有傅斯年本人所写的系统文本作为依据,有助于理解其近乎口号的观念,避免断章取义或隔义附会。以比较求得近真与头绪,是将史学与史料学有机联系的关键;而把握扩张史料与新旧史料,整理材料与"聪明考证","东方学之正统在中国"与"虏学"、"全汉",以及考订与"大事"的关系,可以寻其本意,扩张积极效应。Fu Sinian's view that 'the study of history is only the study of historical materials' originally appeared in his article 'The Objectives of the Institute of History and Philology',but its complete explanation was presented in An Introduction to Historical Research Methods.The Introduction may be an unfinished draft,but several important chapters are based on systematic texts written by Fu Sinian himself.These texts can help us understand his almost slogan-like viewpoint and avoid quoting it out of context or making irrelevant comparisons.Using comparison to pursue clues and approximate truths is the key to intrinsically linking history with historical materials.And we can seek out its original conception and expand its positive effects by mastering the relationships between extended historical materials and new and old historical data,between re-organizing historical materials and 'doing brilliant evidentiary studies',between 'Orientalist arthodox in China' and 'Luxue'(虏学)versus 'Quanhan'(全汉),and between textual research and 'great events'.

关 键 词：傅斯年 史料学 史学方法导论 

分 类 号：K092.7[历史地理—历史学]