成也镜像,败也镜像——评拉康哲学之失  

Nothing But a Mirror Image,No Matter What the Ego is——A Comment on Defects of Lacan's Philosophy

作　　者：陈鹏[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京大学哲学系,江苏南京210093

出　　处：《东北大学学报（社会科学版）》2007年第5期398-402,共5页Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)

摘　　要：拉康哲学以悲观极端的方式从反面证明了马克思的人的本质是社会关系总和的论断。但他的理论忽视了实践机制对人意识形成的建构作用,也没有对他者的来源和本质作出合理解释;由于其理论辩证性的缺失,将意识的建构单向绝对化,导致其理论座架没能走出主客二分的近代哲学构架,并隐含着价值悬设。事实上个体意识对人类文化的继承和发展的关系,是"小我"和"大我"在社会历史场域中的实践关系。It was unexpected by Jacques Lacan that his theory expressed in form of extreme pessimism just proved reversely the Marx＇ s thesis that the human nature is the sum and total of one＇ s social relations. Ignoring the effect of practice mechanism on the formation of human consciousness, his theory gave no reasonable explanation to the source and essence of the Other （other）. Because of the deficiency of dialectic thinking in his theory, he absolutized unidirectionally the formation of consciousness, thus resulting in that the framework of his theory couldn＇ t go out of the framework of modern philosophy, i.e. , the subjectobject dichotomy with the implication of values suspended. Actually the relationship between individual consciousness and human culture is inherited and developmental, i.e. , a practice relationship between the material ego and spiritual ego in different socio-historical domains.

关 键 词：拉康哲学 镜像 他者 实践 社会关系 辩证性 

分 类 号：N031[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]