检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:鲍焕然[1]
机构地区:[1]武汉理工大学人文社会科学系,湖北武汉430063
出 处:《武汉大学学报(人文科学版)》2007年第5期671-675,共5页Wuhan University Journal (Humanity Sciences)
摘 要:新民歌运动表征着中国现代性建构实践的激进化,在新诗发展史上具有标志性意义。它旨在建构优越于西方现代性的民族文化并真诚地借用"古典"和"民歌"的形式,结果却在规范与规训的双重作用下,于一体化认同建构过程中形成对世俗现代性的渴望与追求同审美现代性的极度缺失的强烈反差,从而走向对真正意义上的古典和民歌的自反性否定。对新民歌运动及与之相关的17年文学的研究存在反二元对立、重审现代性、回归历史等三种批评角度,批评的异响本身暗示着17年文学貌似单纯的现象背后的深刻复杂性。The new folk-song movements, which represent the radicalization of construction of Chinese modernity, has the symbolic significance in the new poem development. Its purpose is to construct the national culture which is superior to that of western modernity, and sincerely borrow the form of "classics" and "folk-song ", which results in a striking contrast between the aspiration of secular modernity and the extreme absence of esthetic modernity under the dual function of the criterion and the discipline during the construction process at the integrated approval, and thus moves towards the self-contradictional denial of the true "classics" and "folk-song". The researches to the new folk-song movements and the corresponding 17 years literature lie in three kind of criticisms angles: dual opposition, re-examining modernity and recovering history. The diversity criticisms indicate the profound complexity behind the seemingly pure phenomenon of 17 years literature.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3