检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《广州医药》2007年第5期62-64,共3页Guangzhou Medical Journal
摘 要:目的比较加替沙星与左氧氟沙星治疗泌尿系统感染的成本-效果。方法采用药物经济学原理对两种治疗方案进行成本-效果分析。结果加替沙星与左氧氟沙星组治疗泌尿系统感染的有效率分别为93.75%、87.5%(P>0.05);不良反应发生率分别为6.3%、8.3%(P>0.05)。成本-效果比(C/E)分别为8.75、4.31。与左氧氟沙星组相比,加替沙星组每增加一个单位效果需多花费70.91元。结论左氧氟沙星治疗泌尿系统感染成本-效果比优于加替沙星。Objective To compare the cost-effectiveness of gatifioxacin and levofloxacin in the treatment of patients with infection in urinary system. Methods Principle of pharmacoeconomics was adopted to analyze cost-effectiveness of the two treatment schemes. Results The effective rates of gatifloxacin group and levofioxacin group in the treatment of urinary sys- tem infection were 93.75% and 87. 50% ( P 〉 0. 05 ) respectively; the incidence rate of adverse reactions were 6. 3% and 8.3% ( P 〉0. 05 ) ; the cost-effectiveness ratio (C/E) were 8.75 and 4. 31 respectively. The cost for every one unit increment of effectiveness for gatifloxacin group was 70. 91 yuan more than that of the levofioxacin group. Conclusion Cost-effectiveness ratio of levofioxacin is superior to that of gatifioxacin in the treatment of urinary system infection.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28