论英语学术书评实据性的特点及作用  

On the Features and Roles of Evidentiality in EABR

作　　者：李健雪[1] 严敏芬[1] 

机构地区：[1]徐州师范大学外国语学院,江苏徐州221116

出　　处：《徐州师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2007年第5期131-136,共6页Journal of Xuzhou Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：Chafe关于学术写作实据性与英语口语实据性所作的对比研究,为实据性的应用研究提供了理论和方法上的指导。英语学术书评作为学术写作的一种基本形式,在学术研究领域占有重要地位。研究英语学术写作中实据性的特点及作用,不仅可以拓展实据性的理论研究范围,而且对实据性的应用研究也起一定的推动作用。通过对国际《语用学杂志》书评栏目中随机抽出的11篇书评中的实据类型和实据标记进行统计分析,结果表明:1)英语学术书评中的实据性具有证据类型的间接性、获取证据手段的多样性和证据获得的非主观性的特点;2)实据性的作用主要体现在书评作者与原作/原作者在概念化范畴内的主观间互动、书评语篇与原作在语篇间的互动、书评作者/原作者以及读者在认知空间建构中的互动等方面。The comparative study of evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing by Chafe provides theoretical and methodological guidance for applied research of evidentiality. As one of the basic forms of academic writing, English Academic Book Review （EABR） shares important position in research field. The study of the features and the roles of evidentiality in EABR is of great significance both theoretically and practically. On statistical analysis of types of evidence and evidential markers, which are based on the 11 book reviews randomly sampled from BOOK REVIEW column in international Journal of Pragmatics, it gave the following results： 1 ） the features of evidentiality in EABR are as follows： the indirectness of evidence type, the varieties of evidence device and the non - subjectiveness of acquiring evidence; 2） the roles of evidentiality in EABR are in the form of interactivenss, that is, intersubjective interactiveness, intertextual interactivenss and the interactiveness in epistemic space.

关 键 词：英语学术书评 实据性 特点 作用 

分 类 号：G256.4[文化科学—图书馆学]