检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]国防科技大学,湖南长沙410073
出 处:《火力与指挥控制》2007年第9期47-50,共4页Fire Control & Command Control
基 金:国防预研基金资助项目(413040402)
摘 要:军事需求不一致问题事关军事信息系统建设的成败。首先,分析了军事需求不一致的表现形式和产生原因,并从本体论的特征、功能入手对本体论与解决军事需求不一致问题的关系进行了讨论,提出了基于本体解决军事需求不一致问题的思路。其次,以军事需求活动为主线,将军事需求本体分为概念本体、动作本体和活动本体,并通过应用领域分析、描述对象分析和对象关系分析三个基本步骤进行确定。第三,根据各类军事需求本体的不同,对各处本体的建模方法分别进行了阐述。最后,利用语义推理,实现了基于本体的军事需求一致性分析,并对推理步骤进行了详细的叙述。The problem of military requirement inconsistency relates to the successful construction of a military information system. Firstly, the representation forms and the causing reasons are analyzed, the relationships between the ontology and solving the problem of military requirement inconsistency are discussed by studying the characters and functions of the ontology, and then, an ontology-based method that solves the problem is brought out. Secondly, according to the military requirement activities, the military requirement ontologies are divided into the Conception-ontology,the Behavior-ontology and the Activity-ontology, which are confirmed by three basic stepsL: application-domain analysis, describingobject analysis and object-relationships analysis. Thirdly ,based on the differences among the three kinds of military requirement ontology, the modeling methods are detailed narrated separately. The last, by using semantic deduction, the ontology-based consistency analysis for military requirements is realized, and the deduction steps are detailed narrated.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.148