中国制度变迁和演化路径的多样性  

Diversified Paths of Institutional Changes and Evolution in China

作　　者：刘刚[1] 

机构地区：[1]南开大学经济研究所,天津300071

出　　处：《南开学报（哲学社会科学版）》2007年第5期46-57,共12页Nankai Journal:Philosophy,Literature and Social Science Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金(05BJL045);2005年教育部"新世纪人才"计划资助项目

摘　　要：20世纪80年代以来经济转型的实践表明,中国不同区域之间制度变迁和演进的路径存在着相当大的差异。与新古典经济学制度分析范式不同,20世纪90年代以来以诺思为代表的制度演化理论认为,制度变迁更多地属于自组织系统的自我演化过程。作为内生和演进的系统,制度变迁是在不确定条件下当事人集体学习、模仿、试错和创新活动中共同知识与信念的形成、演化的结果。在"分权改革"背景下,中国制度变迁和演化路径多样性产生的根源在于:处于不同环境和经济结构条件下的地方政府和当地经济组织之间互动中的集体学习,会形成不同的具有当地特征的共同知识和信念。制度在很大程度上属于当地化的惯例性默示知识,从这个意义上说,任何其他目家或地区成功的制度变迁模式都只具有借鉴意义。There are huge differences on the institutional changes and evolution in China different areas for the economy＇s institutional transition from the 1980s. In North＇s theory, the institutional transition is the evolution of selforganization system, which is different from the new classical economics theory. As an endogenous and evolutionary system, the institutional change is the outcome that people collectively learn, imitate, and innovate under uncertainty conditions. On the background of ＇ reformation of division of powers＇, the reasons for the various paths of the institutional changes and evolution are as following： Firstly, the mutu- al collective learning between local government and economical organizations under different environment and economical structure forms variable common knowledge and belief bearing local characteristics. Secondly, the institution is the local conventional and tacit knowledge to a great extent. Therefore, it is only significant for China to use for reference from any successful institutional transition model of other countries and districts.

关 键 词：制度创新 制度演化的内生性 共同知识和信念 路径依赖和锁定 

分 类 号：F123[经济管理—世界经济]