检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《上海医学影像》2007年第3期221-223,共3页Shanghai Medical Imaging
摘 要:目的通过常规基波成像和组织谐波显像技术对比,探讨组织谐波显像技术在胆道疾病超声诊断中临床应用价值。方法应用组织谐波显像技术对比分析73例胆道疾病中基波和组织谐波显像技术的图像结果。结果在观察胆囊结石、胆总管结石、胆囊息肉、胆囊壁上胆固醇结晶形成、胆囊腺肌症、胆囊癌和胆总管癌中,应用组织谐波显像技术超声诊断符合率分别是100%、93%、100%、100%、80%;常规二维检出率分别是96%、60%、90%、80%、40%,二者比较差异显著(P<0.05)。组织谐波显像技术明显优于基波显像。结论组织谐波成像技术可以大大提高胆囊疾病的超声诊断准确率,具有显著临床应用价值。Objective To compare the ultrasonic diagnosis of biliary duct diseases by the fundamental imaging with that of the tissue harmonic imaging. Methods A total of 73 cases suffering from various biliary tract diseases were examined with fundamental and tissue harmonic imaging. Results In the examination of gallbladder stones, common duct stones, gallbladder cholesterol crystal, and gallbladder carcinomas and common bile duct cancers, the correct diagnesis by tissue harmonic imaging were 100%,93%, 100%, 100%and80%, respectively. While by fundamental imaging were 96%,60%,90%,80%and 40%,respectively. There was significant difference between the two wetlwds (P〈0.05). Conclusion The tissue harmonic imaging is superior to fundamental imaging in the diagnosis of biliary duct diseases reguarding of imaging quality as welI as diagnostic accuracy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.127