检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]河北理工大学
出 处:《河南冶金》2007年第4期33-35,共3页Henan Metallurgy
摘 要:双机架中板轧制多数未能在粗轧机后安装测厚仪,因而中间坯厚度精度较差,第二架精轧测厚仪也是轧后监测,滞后性较大。测厚计AGC滞后很少,但不同AGC因为偏差信号传递方式不同,厚度控制效果并不相同。本文采用新开发的交互式图形化轧制仿真平台,在设备参数相同前提下,通过输入同种原料条件,对直接轧制和几种液压AGC系统进行了仿真比较,结果表明Dynam ic set-AGC方式具有突出的优点。During rolling of medium plate on double stands it is rarely to fit thickness gauge after rough mill, so that the thickness precision of medium slab is worse. Thickness gauge of the second stand of the finish rolling is monitoring after the rolling, thus the hysteresis quality is very strong. However,the hysteresis quality of the thickness gauge AGC is very weak, but the different AGC has the differences of deliver way, the thickness control effect is also different. This paper adopts interactive graph rolling simulation software which is new exploited, based on equipment parameters are same, direct rolling and several hydromantic ply auto -control system was simulated through inputs the same material parameters, it being proved that the Dynamic - AGC was more excellence.
关 键 词:中板轧制 交互仿真 GM-AGC DYNAMIC set-AGC
分 类 号:TG333.7[金属学及工艺—金属压力加工]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.104