也谈《汉书·艺文志》“赋”的分类标准——与汪祚明先生商榷  

A Debate with Wang Zuo- ming on Classification of fu＇s in Hanshu Yiwenzhi

作　　者：郭院林[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京大学中文系,北京100871

出　　处：《义乌工商职业技术学院学报》2007年第2期69-72,87,共5页

摘　　要：《汉书·艺文志》将“赋”类又分为四类：屈赋、陆贾赋、荀赋与杂赋。但分类标准究竟是什么，直到清代才有讨论。本文从文献学入手，考镜源流，厘清各种说法，驳斥汪祚明按品分类编次的说法，论定程千帆先生所归纳前人的标准是可靠的，亦即《诗赋略》其实还应该看作汉代文学作品样式的著录，屈原赋属楚辞，陆贾赋属汉大赋，荀子赋属《诗》与《楚辞》的过渡，杂赋属于其他没有明显特征的文体。Hanshu Yiwenzhi （The bibliographic treatise of the Han Dynasty） classifies fu （a literary genre） into four sorts： Qu Yuan fu, Lujia fu, Xunzi fu, and miscellaneous fu. But the criterion as to classification of fu was not debated on until the Qing Dynasty. This paper, based on study of all the literatures on this subjects, disproves Wang Zuoming＇ method of classification according to grade of quality, and affirms Cheng Qianfan＇ approach, according to which, Shifulue should be deemed as a genre of literature in Han Dynasty, Qu Yuan fu should fall into Chuci, Lujia fu should belong to Handafu, Xunzi fu is transitional genre from Shi to Chuci, and miscellaneous fu is a genre without distinct features.

关 键 词：赋类标准 品类 表达方式 

分 类 号：K204[历史地理—历史学]