检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中山大学,广州510275
出 处:《外语学刊》2007年第5期87-90,共4页Foreign Language Research
基 金:国家社科基金项目"叙事的社会符号学研究"(03CYY008);广东省高校外语教学改革与实践培育项目"系统功能语言学角度中的高校应用英语教学改革"的阶段性成果之一
摘 要:话语批评就像考古学,其任务在于从语篇断裂的地层中寻找分散的意义以及这些意义的多重来源。从历时观点来看,传统阅读/写作理论所强调的语篇的"一致性"将不复存在。我们看到的是"断裂的作者"、"断裂的语篇"。表面上天衣无缝的语篇实际上是杂声、复调的。在索然寡味的"作者"的标签下隐含着完全异质的"作者身份"。许多经典功能主义者所说的"连贯"也因此面临挑战。本文以童话叙事中的隐性对话为例,说明语篇中所蕴含的不同声音以及意识形态的矛盾和冲突,从而说明语篇的断裂性。The task of critical discourse analysis is to trace the dispersed meanings and their multiple sources in texts. It can be compared to archeology, which reconstructs vanished forms of life from their traces in fossil. From the diachronic perspective, the socalled ' unity' of text in the traditional theory of reading/writing will disappear. Both the texts and the authors turn out to be fissured. Although texts may appear to be seamless, they are essentially heteroglossic and polyphonic. Under the bland word ' writer' is concealed the sheer heterogeneity of the authorship of text. The concept of ' coherence' in the classics of functional linguistics is thus faced with challenge. Through analyzing implicit dialogues in texts, this paper reveals the multiple voices and the conflict of ideology in texts.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.240.165