检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:付立庆[1]
出 处:《云南大学学报(法学版)》2007年第5期63-66,共4页Jorunal of Yunan University Law Edition
基 金:司法部2006年度国家法治与法学理论研究项目立项课题之"重构我国的犯罪构成理论--比较研究与路径选择"(项目编号06SFB3011)的阶段性成果之一。
摘 要:本文从新近的一种人格刑法的有力主张入手,首先给出了对于当下刑事法网是"厉而不严"而非"又严又厉"的基本判断,在此基础上,认为破除刑法危机、实现刑法机制的良性运转应该以"严而不厉"为基本保障,从而主张在刑罚轻缓化的同时,还必要强调刑法调控范围的适度扩张即犯罪化,并且,为这样的一种主张与时下的"宽严相济的刑事政策"在刑事立法意义上找到了某种契合。This article starts from a recent trenchant argument by personality criminal law, makes a basic judgment that the current criminal law is "severe but not rigorous", but not "severe and rigorous". On such a basis, it argues that the idea of "rigorous but not severe" should be the basic guarantee for solving the criminal law crisis and realizing the benign operation of criminal law mechanism, then it furthers that at the same time of the alleviation of punishment, it is necessary to emphasize the proper expansion of the interference area, namely, criminalization, and, this article find certain conformation in the legislative meaning for such a claim to the current criminal policy with the coordination with harshness and leniency.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.173