检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王廷惠[1]
机构地区:[1]暨南大学经济学院
出 处:《美国研究》2007年第3期70-84,共15页The Chinese Journal of American Studies
基 金:2006年度国家法治与法学理论研究项目中青年课题(6SFB3009)"美国监狱私有化研究--私人部门参与提供公共服务分析"的阶段成果
摘 要:传统意义上,管教罪犯被认为是只有政府才能承担的责任。美国1980年代以来出现了监狱私有化趋势。通过对美国监狱私有化原因、问题及发展前景的分析,对于全面理解私人部门参与提供公共服务,形成竞争性和公私合作制度,具有重要的现实意义。私人监狱能够大幅度节约成本和提高效率的主张并未得到证实,但监狱私有化的主要意义在于引入更多的竞争主体参与提供公共服务,提高公共服务供给的动态效率。最为重要的是应该认识到私有化所导致的节约成本和提高效率,本身是竞争的结果。In the traditional sense, the surveillance and discipline of criminals are the tasks of the government. The rise of the privatization of prisons in the 1980s, therefore, posed a new challenge to the traditional frontier of governance. Through the analysis of the cause, problem and prospects of development of the privatization of American prisons, the article contributes to a comprehensive understanding of privatization, especially the significance of participation of private agencies in providing public service, thus bringing about competition and forming public and private cooperative system. It cannot be verified that private prisons can greatly cut the costs and raise efficiency, but the major significance of privatization of prison lies in the introduction of more competitive entities into the provision of public service and the enhancement of dynamic efficiency of public service provision. The cost cuts and efficiency improvement of privatization are the result of competition.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.4