检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:顾永峰[1] 李能平[1] 方伟敏[1] 卢小兵[1] 丛建农 惠小平[1] 林兆奋[2] 李文放[2] 杨兴易[2]
机构地区:[1]上海市浦东新区公利医院急诊外科,200135 [2]解放军第二军医大学附属长征医院急救科上海市创伤急救中心,上海200003
出 处:《中国急救医学》2007年第10期885-887,共3页Chinese Journal of Critical Care Medicine
摘 要:目的 探讨重度创伤(ISS评分≥16分)的急救原则。方法应用“ATP三原则”救治重度创伤:①外科主治以上医师(Attending)首诊并全权、全程指挥抢救原则;②患者人院后立即成立急救小组(Teamwork)救治原则;③抢救、检查、诊断同时进行,使抢救时间最短的并联(Parallel)原则。分析比较应用“ATP三原则”前、后各2年救治重度创伤的临床效果。结果应用“ATP三原则”前2年(2002-01-01-2003-12-31)共抢救、收治重度创伤388例,ISS评分(25.9±6.4)分,死亡152例,死亡率39.2%,抢救室抢救时间、人院至急诊手术时间分别为(102.84±16.7)min、(140.34±20.6)min。应用“ATP三原则”后2年(2004-01-01-2005-12-31)共抢救、收治重度创伤438例,ISS评分(28.6±7.8)分,死亡87例,死亡率19.9%,抢救室抢救时间、入院至急诊手术时间分别为(69.5±11.5)min、(89.64±9.3)min。两组治疗前ISS评分比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);两组治疗后死亡率、抢救时间、入院至手术时间比较差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05),应用“ATP三原则”后均明显降低。结论 应用“ATP三原则”救治重度创伤能显著缩短抢救时间,降低创伤死亡率。Objective To study the emergency treatment principles of severe trauma ( injury severity score ≥ 16). Methods The application of "ATP three principles" to treat severe trauma patients : ①attending principle, surgeon diagnosed and treated at the all stages ;②teamwork principle, immediately after patients were admitted to hospital; ③parallel principle, emergency resuscitation, examination and laboratory test were performed at the same time. To retrospectively analyse and compare the clinical effect 2 years before and after the application of ATP principles. Results Two years ( from January 1,2002 to December 31,2003) before the application of ATP principles, severe trauma 388 cases accepted emergency treatment, ISS was 25.9 ±6.4,152 cases died, the mortality was 39.2%, the time in emergency department and the time to operation room after admission were ( 102.8±16.7) min, ( 140.3±20.6) min respectively. Two years (from January 1,2004 to December 31,2005) after the application of ATP principles, severe trauma 438 cases accepted emergency treatment, ISS was 28.6 ±7.8,87 cases died, the mortality was 19.9%, the time in emergency department and the time to operation room after admission were (69.5 ± 11.5 ) rain, ( 89.6± 9.3 ) min respectively. There were no significant differences in ISS between two groups ( P 〉 0.05 ), but the differences of the mortality, the time in emergency department and the time to operation room were significant between two groups ( P 〈 0.05 ), and all decreased significantly after the application of ATP principles. Conclusions The application of ATP principles to treat severe trauma patients can shorten emergency time and decrease mortality.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.53