检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国中医急症》2007年第10期1191-1193,共3页Journal of Emergency in Traditional Chinese Medicine
摘 要:目的观察痰热清注射液联合头孢哌酮/舒巴坦治疗医院获得性肺炎的临床疗效。方法将80例医院获得性肺炎患者随机分为两组,治疗组42例采用痰热清注射液联合头孢哌酮/舒巴坦治疗,对照组38例单用头孢哌酮/舒巴坦治疗;比较两组治疗前后患者体温、呼吸道症状、肺部口罗音、血常规、胸部X线、细菌学检查等改善情况及治疗中出现的不良反应。结果治疗组总有效率88.09%,对照组总有效率73.68%,有明显差异;两组患者用药治疗过程无明显不良反应。结论痰热清注射液联合头孢哌酮/舒巴坦治疗医院获得性肺炎临床疗效优于单用头孢哌酮/舒巴坦。Objective To observe the efficacy of Tanreqing Injection combined with Cefoperazone/sulbactam in treatment of hospital - acquired pneumonia. Methods: 80 patients with hospital - acquired pneumonia were randomly divided into two groups. The treatment group ( n = 42) were given Tanreqing Injection and Cefoperazone/sulbactam; the control group( n =38) were given Cefoperazone/sulbactam. The temperature, symptoms of respiratory tract, crackles of lung, blood routine tests, X - ray of chest and checked of bacteria were measured on two groups before arid after treatment. The adverse effects during treatment were observed too. Results: The effective rate of the treatment group were 88.09%. The control group were 73.68%. There were statistically significant difference between the two groups. Conclusions: The efficacy of hospital - acquired pneumonia treated with Tanreqing Injection combined with Cefoperazone/sulbactam better than treated with Cefoperazone/sulbactam only.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.52