论类推适用的概念——以两大法系类推适用之比较为基础  

Discussion about the Conception of Analogy——By the comparison of analogy lying in the Continent law system and the Anglo-American law system

作　　者：屈茂辉[1] 张彪[1] 

机构地区：[1]湖南大学法学院,湖南长沙410082

出　　处：《河北法学》2007年第11期31-37,共7页Hebei Law Science

摘　　要：由于在类推适用的定位、适用前提、援引对象等方面的认识存在差异,学者们对类推适用的概念界定不一。其原因在于未能认识到大陆法系和英美法系在类推适用的地位、适用范围、援引对象上的差异。对类推适用的认识及其概念的准确界定必须建立在对两大法系类推适用的比较分析之上,并区分对两大法系共同适用之类推适用的一般概念与仅适用于具体法律背景之特殊概念。The discrepancies which lie in such aspects as the location of analogy, the applicable premise of analogy, and the quoting object of analogy, causing the discrepancies of scholars＇ definition to the conception ＂analogy＂ coming from the non-knowledge of the difference between the Continent law system and the Anglo-American law system in the position, basis and applicable scope of the application of ＂analogy＂. The precise definition of ＂analogy＂ lies in the comparison in the two legal systems. We must distinguish the general conception applied in the two legal systems together and special conception applied in the specific legal background only.

关 键 词：类推适用 大陆法系 荚美法系 概念 

分 类 号：D923.49[政治法律—民商法学]