反倾销司法审查制度分析——兼论我国反倾销行政诉讼规定之缺陷  

Approaches on Anti-dumping Judicial Review System——Versus the Deficiencies of China's Anti-Dumping Litigation Rules

作　　者：期海明[1] 

机构地区：[1]昆明理工大学法学院,云南昆明650093

出　　处：《昆明师范高等专科学校学报》2007年第3期36-39,共4页Journal of Kunming Teachers College

摘　　要：应WTO反倾销协议的原则和要求,最高人民法院制定了审理反倾销行政案件的规定,尝试建立我国的反倾销司法审查制度。基于反倾销调查程序涉及复杂的经济数据(事实)问题,我国相关的司法审查制度中欠缺对倾销和损害构成的认定与评判司法审查技术层面上的具体规定。我国应借鉴欧共体、美国等国家和地区反倾销审查的司法经验,规范和完善我国反倾销审查程序,以使我国反倾销行政案件的审理程序和实体规定符合WTO反倾销审查的原则和要求。Responding to China＇s WTO Anti-dumping Commitment, the SPC set tbrth Anti-dumping Judicial Interpretation attempting to establish a system of the Anti-dumping administration litigation. In this article, I will argue that it＇s necessary for China to provide a neutral way for Anti-dumping judicial review. Upon briefly introducing thestandard of review under WTO Anti-dumping Agreement, the paper approaches the deficiencies of SPC＇s Judicial Interpretation and implies that Relevant Authorities in China should make the Anti-dumping justice system more reliable and practicable on the stand of WTO member.

关 键 词：WTO反倾销协议 反倾销 司法审查 审查制度 审查程序 行政诉讼 

分 类 号：D922.294[政治法律—经济法学]