检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:聂瑜[1]
机构地区:[1]浙江大学法学院,杭州310028
出 处:《法律与医学杂志》2007年第3期208-216,共9页Journal of Law & Medicine
摘 要:现在医药领域里,回扣泛滥成灾,有着深刻的社会原因。医生收取回扣刑事上能否定罪,医生处方行为的性质定性以及受贿罪还是商业贿赂罪的定位在学界存在很大的争议。完善相关的法律制度,明确对医疗回扣的刑事民事行政责任的认定。寻求更好的法律救济,需要完善刑法立法,确定医生收取回扣刑法上的定罪量刑。建立医疗服务合同,加强行政监管,国家宏观调控的引导下结合市场经济的调节,保护患者合法利益,治理医疗腐败,解决医疗回扣问题势在必行。In current medical world, medical kickbacks, due to the profound social causes, have a deep and wide penetration. It has long been a controversial issue that whether doctors received kickbacks can be convicted crime and what is the qualitative nature of the crime. We need to improve the relevant legal system, clear the civil and administrative responsibility of the medical kickbacks. To seek better legal relief, it is necessary to improve criminal legislation to define the criminal conviction and sentencing of doctors receiving kickbacks. In order to protect the legitimate interests of patients and deal with medical corruption, establishing medical services contract, strengthening administrative supervision, and combining market under the guidance of the state' s macroeconomic control are imperative
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30