检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李安学[1] 董惠翔[1] 刘玉春[1] 刘作坤[1] 蔡云亮[1]
出 处:《中国医师进修杂志》2007年第10期14-16,共3页Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨中心静脉导管导丝支撑引导行钢丝螺纹管气管内插管在困难气管插管时应用的有效性和安全性。方法将80例估计气管插管有困难的患者(舌咽关系Ⅲ-Ⅳ级)随机分为导丝支撑引导插管组(A组)和常规导管芯引导插管组(B组)。进行插管对比研究。结果两组一次插管成功率分别是90.0%和67.5%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05),并且A组对咽喉部组织损伤小。结论中心静脉导管导丝支撑引导钢丝螺纹管插管在困难气管插管时应用有效、安全可行。Objective To observe the effectiveness and safety of endotracheal intubation supported by central venous catheter guide-wire using in the difficult endotracheal intubation. Methods Eighty patients who had been estimated difficult to endotracheal intubation(the relation of tongue and pharynx was Ⅲ- Ⅳ degrees )were divided randomly into two groups, the group of wire-einforced tracheal tube insertion method supported by central venous catheter guide-wire(group A)and the group of insertion method support by routine guide-wire (group B). Results The successful rate of one time insertion was 90.0% in group A and 67.5% in group B,there was significantly different between two groups (P〈 0.05). The injury to laryngopharynx of group A was lighter than that of group B. Conclusion Wire-reinforced tracheal tube insertion method supported by central venous catheter guide-wire is effective, safe and feasible.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249