两种固定PICC导管方法的对比分析  

Comparative analysis on two different ways of fixing PICC tube

作　　者：郭梅[1] 龚海芬[1] 汪丹[1] 王建荣[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民解放军总医院

出　　处：《护理研究（下旬版）》2007年第10期2783-2784,共2页Chinese Nursing Researsh

摘　　要：[目的]选择PICC导管牢固的固定方法,以达到限制导管自由进出体内有效地预防感染的目的。[方法]将242例置管的病人随机分为实验组与对照组,实验组采取用改良固定法,对照组采用常规固定法。[结果]实验组与对照组比较,实验组明显限制了导管自由进出体内,降低了局部感染率(P<0.05),贴膜的牢固程度两组比较无统计学意义(P>0.05)。[结论]采用改良固定法,减少了局部感染,保持了贴膜的牢固性,使局部洁净美观。Objective：To Select fixation method of PICA] catheter for prevent infection effectively by restricting PICC catheter＇s movement in the body. Method：Totally 242 patients were devided randomly into etest group and cntrol group. Patients of the test group adopted the reformed fixation method. While Patients of the control group took the routine method. Result：Comparison of test and control group identified that test group obviously restricted PICC catheter in the body and decreased local infection（ P 〈 0.05 ）, There was no statistical significance of membrane fixation comparison. Conclusion： Reformed fixation adopted by test group reduced local infection, maintained membrane fixation and kept the local skin neat and tidy.

关 键 词：固定方法 PICC导管 局部感染 

分 类 号：R47[医药卫生—护理学]