检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《陕西医学杂志》2007年第6期726-727,共2页Shaanxi Medical Journal
摘 要:目的:比较0.75%布比卡因和0.75%左旋布比卡因用于术后硬膜外止痛的的镇痛效果与安全性.方法:选择ASA分级Ⅰ~Ⅱ级下肢手术接受术后硬膜外镇痛的病人50例,随机分为2组:A组(n=25)用0.75%布比卡因;B组(n=25)用0.75%左旋布比卡因行术后硬膜外自控镇痛,观察患者12h、24h和48h的镇痛效果、镇痛满意程度、各组药物需求量(PCA按压次数×0.5ml)以及有关的副作用.结果:两组均可达到完善的镇痛效果,均无剧痛病例,B组药物需求量(PCA按压次数×0.5ml)多于A组(P<0.05),均未见局麻药毒性反应和并发症.结论:0.75%布比卡因用于术后硬膜外镇痛,其镇痛效果优于0.75%左旋布比卡因.Objective: To compare the effects and safety of 0. 75% bupivaciane and 0. 75% Levobupivacaine in epidural analgesia afer operation. Mehtods: 50 ASA Ⅰ~Ⅱ adults scheduled for lower extremity or Lower limb surgery were divided into two groups. Group A, and B (n= 25 in each group) received 0. 75%bupivacaine and 0. 75% levobupivacaine respectively for PCEA. The analgesia effect , satisfaction degree, medicine demand (number of PCEA attack × 0. 5ml) and related side effect were observed at that time 12h , 24h and 48h. Results. Each group obtained satisfactory analgesia effect . Medicine demand of group B(number of PCEA attack × 0. 5ml)was more than group A(P〈0. 05). There appeared no toxic responses and mplications. Conclusion: The effect of 0. 75% bupivacaine in epidural analgesia is superior to 0. 75%levobupivacaine.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117