刑法关于“多次盗窃”的重新解读  

Re-interpreting the Repeated Thefts in Criminal Law

作　　者：马家福[1] 刘一亮[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学法学院,重庆400031

出　　处：《福建公安高等专科学校学报（社会公共安全研究）》2007年第5期15-18,共4页The Study of Social Public Security

摘　　要：盗窃罪中对"数额较大"的主张是我国刑法采取结果无价值论立场之结果,而对"多次盗窃"的强调则为行为无价值论和人格刑法学者所倡导。从客观立场出发,对"多次盗窃"进行重新解读,得出"多次盗窃"中的"次"是指基于一个概括的犯意,而完整实施的一系列连贯的盗窃动作;多次盗窃与数额较大之间存在内在的等价、统一关系,但无位阶关系;《解释》的第4条和第5条中第12项的"多次盗窃"意思相同,是一个点的两个面。The sentence of the crime of theft with ＂relatively large amount＂ is the result of ＂Erfolgsunwert＂ adopted by Criminal Law in our country, while the emphasis on ＂ repeated thefts＂ is advocated by scholars who believe in ＂Handlungsunwert＂ and ＂Personality Criminal Jurisprudence＂ .We try to re-interpret the ＂repeated thefts＂ from an objective position to find out that the ＂frequency＂ ＂of repeated thefts＂ refers to a series of continuous theft actions being successfully conducted based on a generalized intention. There is an internal equivalence and unification between the ＂repeated thefts＂ and the ＂large amount＂ , but it＇s not the primary and secondary relationship. In the Interpretation, the meaning of ＂repeated thefts＂ in the Article 4 and the Item 12 of Article 5 is the same since it is the different sides of one point.

关 键 词：多次盗窃 次 数额 等价关系 重新解读 

分 类 号：DF625[政治法律—刑法学]