检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张亚平[1]
机构地区:[1]河南大学现代法制研究所,河南开封475001
出 处:《福建公安高等专科学校学报(社会公共安全研究)》2007年第5期19-24,共6页The Study of Social Public Security
摘 要:《违法行为矫治法》脱胎于劳动教养制度。劳动教养制度因其法律依据不足,审批程序混乱而备受诘难,以《违法行为矫治法》取代劳动教养制度是当前立法趋势。在出台该法之前,必须对其准确定性。其不是行政刑法,违法行为矫治也不属于行政处罚,应当将违法行为矫治定性为行政强制措施,以凸显其可诉性、非惩罚性以及保安性之特质。这样定性对该法内容及执行方式都有重要影响。The Law of Correcting the Unlawful Action derives from the Rehabilitation-through-labour System, which has been criticized because of the absence of legal foundation and the confusion of approval procedures. It's the tendency to take the place of the Rehabilitation-through-labour System with the Law of Correcting the Unlawful Action. The nature of the Law of Correcting the Unlawful Action should be determined correctly before its promulgation. The Law of Correcting the Unlawful Action does not belong to Administrative Criminal Law, nor the measure of correcting the unlawful action, but to the administrative coercive measures to stress its litigiousness, unpunitiveness and its characteristic of keeping security. This determination of the nature of the Law of Correcting the Unlawful Action will affect its contents and its executive ways.
分 类 号:DF34[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222