检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘志云[1]
出 处:《福建公安高等专科学校学报(社会公共安全研究)》2007年第5期25-32,共8页The Study of Social Public Security
基 金:国家社科基金项目"国际关系理论与当代国际法的实践"阶段成果(项目编号:07CFX044)
摘 要:自二战结束以来,南北双方在联合国内外对经济主权内涵与具体制度的设计曾展开针锋相对的斗争。尤其是在国际投资法方面,无论是理论上,还是实践中,发展中国家都表现出寸土不让的强硬立场。但是,20世纪80年代中期后,尤其是冷战结束以来,形势发生了变化,即国际投资立法实现从"管制"向"自由化"方向过渡。在这种自由化立法趋势下,发展中国家及中国的角色定位以及战略选择尤为重要。Since the end of the Second World War, there is a severe conflict on the connotation of economic sovereign rights and the design of some specific systems between the South and the North inside and outside the United Nations. Particularly, on the aspect of international investment law, all the developing countries have shown their solid ground - never to budge an inch not only in theories but in practice. Nevertheless, in the middle and late 1980s, especially after the Cold War, the condition has got changed, in other words, the international investment legislation has realized its transition from "control" to "liberty" .Under this tendency of liberty in legislation, it is much more significant for the developing countries including China to have a proper role-location and strategic selection.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.226