检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]浙江大学医学院附属儿童医院,浙江杭州310003
出 处:《儿科药学杂志》2007年第5期38-39,共2页Journal of Pediatric Pharmacy
摘 要:目的:调查我院门诊电子处方质量,探讨避免问题处方产生的对策。方法:对我院2006年9月~2007年1月门诊电子处方审核过程中发现的问题处方进行统计、分析。结果:审核577 628张处方中,问题处方16 350张,占总处方数2.83%,其中录入错误14 078张,占问题处方数86.10%;药物滥用912张,占5.58%;其他不合理用药处方1 360张,占8.32%。结论:可通过完善电子处方审核系统,加强医务人员综合素质等措施采提高电子处方的质量。Objective: To investigate electronic prescriptions (EPs) of outpatients in our hospital and look for solutions to efiminate questionable EPs. Methods: Questionable EPs during the time from SCp. 2006 to Jan. 2007 were picked out and analyzed statistically. Results: 2.83% of total 577,628 sheets ( 16,350 sheets) were questionable. Among them, there were 14,078 sheets with inputting errors, accounting for 86.1%. In addition, there were 5.58% with drug abuse and 8.32% with other factors. Conclusions: The quality of EPs can be improved with the EPs Screening System perfected and the quality of medical staff promoted.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222