检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]新疆医科大学第六附属医院内科,新疆乌鲁木齐830002
出 处:《新疆医科大学学报》2007年第9期965-966,共2页Journal of Xinjiang Medical University
摘 要:目的:比较诺和锐30与诺和灵30R控制2型糖尿病餐后血糖的差异。方法:采用随机临床对照试验的方法,将40例2型糖尿病患者分为诺和锐30组和诺和灵30R组,分别皮下注射诺和锐30胰岛素和诺和灵30R胰岛素,监测两组患者餐后血糖控制情况,并进行分析比较。结果:两组患者治疗前空腹血糖、餐后血糖值无明显差异,治疗后两组患者空腹血糖值无差异,餐后血糖值差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:诺和锐30控制早餐后血糖的作用优于诺和灵30R。Objective: To compare the difference of efficacy between biphsic insulin aspart 30 (30% fast-acting and 70% protamine-crystallised insulin aspart, BIAsp30) and biphsic human insulin 30(30% regular insulin and 70% NPH insulin, BHI 30) in the patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods: Forty cases of inadequate glycaemic control by oral antidiabetic drug were randomly divided into two groups using twice-daily insulin comparison of BIAsp30 and BHI 30. Efficacy was assessed after 20 days. Results: Significant improvements was observed in postprandial glycaemic control by using BIAsp30 (P 〈 0.05) and there was no differrence in fasting glycaemic control between two kinds of insulin. Conclusion: The rapid-acting insulin analog is superior to regular insulin in controlling postprandial glycaemic.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145