检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈勇生[1] 刘福业[1] 吴文龙[1] 潘方胤[1] 沈万宽[1] 黄振豪[1]
机构地区:[1]广州甘蔗糖业研究所广东省甘蔗改良与生物炼制重点实验室,广州510316
出 处:《甘蔗糖业》2007年第5期1-7,共7页Sugarcane and Canesugar
基 金:农业部"948"项目(2006G37)。
摘 要:2005~20062年新植和2年宿根的结果表明,14个参试品种中,粤糖94-128增产增糖显著,农艺性状及宿根性能好,居于首位;Mex105、福农98-1103、CP8号和闽糖96-1409增糖幅度明显,增产不明显,农艺性状较好,宿根性能方面,Mex105、CP8号和闽糖96-1409强,福农98-1103较差;桂糖94-116和Q170增产幅度大,但增糖不明显,云蔗99-596产量、糖分均介于2对照种之间;其余品种比2对照种均有不同程度的减产、减糖,表现较差。Results from the trials on two crops of plant cane and one crop of ratoon cane during 2005 and 2006 showed that both cane and sugar yields of YT94-128 was significantly higher than those of ROC10(CK1) and ROC 16(CK2), ranking first among the fourteen varieties tested. It performed strong ratooning ability with good agronomic characteristics. Mex 105, FN98-1103, CP8 and MT96-1409 were obviously higher in sugar yield than the two checks, but not in cane yield; the ratooning ability of Mex105, CP8 and MT96-1409 was good, but FN98- 1103 poor, all of them presented good agronomic characteristics. GT94-116 and Q 170 produced higher cane yield than the two checks, but only given even sugar yield when compared with the checks. YZ99-596 was between the 2 check varieties in both cane and sugar yields. The other tested varieties were poorer than the two checks in yield, sucrose content, ratooning ability, etc.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3