检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李文凯[1] 吴玉新[1] 黄志民[1] 樊融[1] 吕俊复[1]
机构地区:[1]清华大学热科学与动力工程教育部重点实验室,北京100084
出 处:《中国粉体技术》2007年第5期10-13,共4页China Powder Science and Technology
基 金:国家科技支撑计划资助项目;编号:2006BAA03B02
摘 要:分别采用筛分法和马尔文激光粒度分析仪两种方法对16种颗粒的粒径分布进行了测量。通过比较,发现两种测量手段得到的粒径分布结果存在较大的差异,马尔文激光粒度方法对颗粒粒径的测量结果偏小,受颗粒形状的影响很大;筛分法对微细颗粒的测量误差较大,但对大粒径颗粒的测量较为准确。通过对不同粒径段灰颗粒的显微照相,发现细颗粒的团聚是筛分法测量小颗粒结果偏小的主要原因。In order to compare the difference between the Malvem laser analyzer and the sieving method in particle size distribution measurement, as many as 16 samples of CFB fly ash were measured by both methods respectively. The results from different methods showed a great diversity. The percentages ofultrafine particles obtained with laser analyzer are overestimated. This is considered to be due to the shape of particles. On the other side, the sieving method showed great errors in the measurements of small-sized particles, but more precise in the measurement of bigger particles. Micrography of particles with different size regio n w ere taken, which proved that the conglomeration of small particles was the main reason why results were smaller in the measurements of small-sized particles with the sieving method.
分 类 号:TB302.1[一般工业技术—材料科学与工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.7.155