检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]山东大学法学院,山东济南250100 [2]黑龙江省人民检察院,黑龙江哈尔滨150080
出 处:《湖南公安高等专科学校学报》2007年第4期11-16,共6页Journal of Huan Public Security College
摘 要:当前学界将习惯法作为反对精英主义路线的学术话语,立足于描述性的研究立场对习惯法概念进行定义,不能彰显习惯法作为实证法的规范属性而具有内在的悖论性特征,这使习惯法的司法化陷入了理论困境,习惯法司法化的困境体现为习惯法作为法源的效力依据问题和司法立场下习惯法的性质定位问题。走出习惯法的司法化困境需要我们摆脱非此即彼的二元思维,通过法律适用的类型思维,实现习惯法和国家法的契通,发挥习惯法的规范功能。At present, customary law is defined as an academic discourse against the elite line by the academic circle. The definition of customary law based on descriptive research cannot demonstrate the inherent paradox characteristics of customary law as norm attributive of real - example law. It brings the jurisdiction of customary law into a predicament which is embodied as the effectiveness of customary law as a source of law and the its nature definition under the standpoint of judicature. Getting out of the predicament of jurisdiction of customary law demands getting rid of the dualistic thought, achieving the combination of customary law and state law as well as bringing the regulation functions of customary law to play through the type thought of legal application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3