检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:林欧[1]
出 处:《湖南公安高等专科学校学报》2007年第4期77-79,共3页Journal of Huan Public Security College
摘 要:反垄断法的执行机制一般分为公力执行和私人执行。私人诉讼在反垄断法中具有监督反垄断主管机关执法,节约政府资源,对垄断行为反应更迅速等作用。越来越多的国家和地区在反垄断法中对私人诉讼作出明确规定。我国反垄断法草案没有规定这一制度,讨论这一命题对我国反垄断立法有重要的现实意义。The enforcing mechanism of anti - monopoly law generally consists of enforcement through public force and private force. Private litigation plays such a role in anti - monopoly law as supervising the enforcement of organs in charge of anti - monopoly, saving resources for government, as well as reacting to monopolizing behaviors more promptly. More and more countries and regions specifically stipulate private litigation in anti - monopoly law. Our country" anti -monopoly law draft does not stipulate this system, so discussing this proposition is of great significance to our country's legislation of anti - monopoly law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.204