铍针配合传统点穴与封闭治疗慢性棘上韧带损伤的对比研究  被引量:1

Contrast Study on the Treatment of Chronic Supraspinal Ligament Injury with Pi-Zhen Combined with Traditional Dianxue and Block Therapy

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:胡思进 陈永向 叶青青 周小敏 应有荣[2] 

机构地区:[1]浙江省瑞安市中医院,浙江瑞安325200 [2]台州医院路桥院区骨伤科

出  处:《中国中医骨伤科杂志》2007年第11期10-11,共2页Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopedics

摘  要:目的:对比观察铍针配合传统点穴疗法与局部封闭(曲安奈德注射液)疗法治疗慢性棘上韧带损伤的疗效。方法:将慢性棘上韧带损伤患者141例随机分为两组。治疗组78例,采用铍针配合传统点穴疗法;对照组63例,采用局部封闭疗法,并对两组临床疗效进行对比观察及随访。结果:两组数据均采用统计学分析(SPSS13.0 for Windows统计软件包):治疗组疗法总有效率96.12%,对照组疗法总有效率76.19%;治疗组临床复发率明显低于对照组;两组相比有非常显著性差异(P<0.01)。结论:治疗组优于对照组。Objective: To compare and to observe the therapeutic effects of Pi-zhen combined with traditional Dianxue and local block(Triamcinolone Acetonide Acetate Injection) in the treatment of chronic supraspinal ligament injury. Methods: One hundred and fouty-one cases of chronic supraspinal ligament injury patients were randomly divided into two groups. Seventy-eight cases in the treatment group were treated with Pi-zhen combined with traditional Dianxue. Sixty-three cases in the control group were treated with local block. The clinical therapeutic effects were observed and compared between the two groups and all cases were followed. Results: The data of the two groups were analyzed statistically(SPSS13.0 for windows). The total effective rate was 96.12% in the treatment group and 76.19% in the control group. The clinical recurrence rate in the treatment group was obviously lower than that in the control group. The difference between the two groups was significant(P〈0. 01). Conclusion: The therapeutic effect in the treatment group is superior to that in the control group.

关 键 词:铍针 传统点穴法 局部封闭 慢性棘上韧带损伤 对比研究 

分 类 号:R686.5[医药卫生—骨科学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象