检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:雷国辉[1] 宋修广[2] 潘维宗[2] 赵承忠[3]
机构地区:[1]河海大学岩土工程水利部重点实验室/岩土工程研究所,南京210098 [2]山东大学土建与水利学院,济南250061 [3]济南市人民政府防汛抗旱指挥部办公室,济南250014
出 处:《岩土力学》2007年第11期2369-2374,共6页Rock and Soil Mechanics
摘 要:分析了敞开型测压管在水位监测时产生滞后现象的机理,提出了一种简单新方法估算滞后时间,并与Hvorslev解答进行了对比。参数分析结果表明,所提出方法估算的滞后时间约为Hvorslev解答的1/5~1/10。当测压管进水段的长度足够时,敞开型测压管可以应用于渗透系数为10-5甚至10-6 cm/s的土体当中,而不会产生显著的滞后现象。通过28根敞开型测压管的现场注水试验,检验了测压管的灵敏度,并验证了分析结果的合理性。The mechanisms of the time lag phenomenon induced in piezometric level observations using open standpipes are analyzed. A new simple method is proposed to estimate the lag time; and it is compared with the Hvorslev's solution, It is found from parametric studies that the estimated lag time by the proposed method is about 1/5 to 1/10 of that by the Hvorslev's method. When the length of the intake portion of the standpipe is long enough, the open standpipes can be used in a soil with the coefficient of permeability of 10^5 or even 10^-6 cm/s, without inducing significant time lag phenomenon. The degrees of sensitivity of 28 open standpipes were examined by field rising-head tests; and the results from the proposed method are verified by the tested results.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28