检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:钟振明[1]
出 处:《同济大学学报(社会科学版)》2007年第5期63-68,78,共7页Journal of Tongji University:Social Science Edition
摘 要:冷战结束后,西方学界中出现了对亚太安全形势发展的不同解读,究其原因,在于他们有选择地从某种理论角度去看待亚太安全中存在的影响到和平与稳定的因素。正确解读亚太安全的前景,不仅要求我们认识存在的那些挑战性问题,同时要求我们分析在不同理论视角中有助于破解现实或意象中的不稳定因素,由此考虑如何为一个更加安全的亚太建构有利条件。After the Cold War, different conceptions concerning the prospects for East Asia security were put forward by western scholars on international relations. The reason for that lies in the different theoretical way they comprehend the factors that may influence peace and stability in East Asia. To understand the prospect for peace in East Asia, we should not only find those challenging problems in the region, but clarify the existent or imagined unstable factors under the different theoretical visions, so that we can adopt policies that may contribute to a more stable East Asia.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28