检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郑君芳[1]
出 处:《西安石油大学学报(社会科学版)》2007年第4期56-61,共6页Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University:Social Science Edition
摘 要:对于是否应当系统地引入优先权制度以及如何定位优先权制度,在《物权法》起草过程中引起广泛争议,而最终出台的《物权法》并未接受统一优先权制度。从优先权存在的社会原因、立法基础以及优先权在我国特别法上分散立法的缺陷等角度分析,规定统一优先权制度有着重要的理论和现实意义,十分有必要在相关立法中予以确认并科学定位。而在对统一优先权定位时,应当注意合理协调其与现行立法理论的冲突。The scholars disputed very much on the systematic introduction of the priority system as well as how to locate the priority system during the process of drawing up the real right laws.However,the final real right laws didn't accept the unified priority system.Actually,if the analysis is implemented from social reason of the priority existence,the legislation foundation and the priority's flaw in separate legislation of our special law,it is indicated that the unified priority system has theoretical and practical significance,and is necessary to be confirmed and scientifically located in the relevant legislation.While the unified priority is located,much attention should be paid to the sensible solution to the conflict between the unified priority and the present legislation theory.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.20