检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京农学院,北京102206 [2]中国农业大学,北京100094 [3]西北农林科技大学,陕西杨凌712100
出 处:《西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2007年第6期39-43,共5页Journal of Northwest A&F University(Social Science Edition)
基 金:北京农学院三项基金"北京市原料奶生产竞争力与经济效率研究"资助
摘 要:改革开放以来,我国奶业发展迅速,但政府奶业相关配套政策目标不明确,手段单一。通过对美国、欧盟、日本奶业政策、手段、效果进行分析,发现不同国家根据各自不同的奶业发展状况设定了适合本国的奶业政策,充分利用WTO允许的政策手段,在保护水平上OECD在大部分年份里奶业的PSE值都高于农业总体的PSE值。目前必须在一定时期内把加强对民族奶业的保护作为我国奶业政策总的目标;在政府奶业扶持政策中,充分利用"绿箱"补贴给予的机会,积极扶持奶农发展。Since the beginning of reform, dairy industry in China has seen a rapid development. But the policy objectives of milk are not clear and policy means is not enough. This article analyses the milk policy of USA, EU and Japan. The conclusions are as follows. First, their countries set their policy objec- tives according to concrete situations of dairy industry. Second, every policy instruments that WTO allows are fully used. Third,the PSE of milk is higher than the one of agriculture in most years in OECD. At present, the policy objective of milk in China is to protect the national dairy industry. And the government must make full use of every means that WTO allows to support dairy industry.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.40